Taxes on Imports.  Attempts to Limit China’s Exports by Raising Taxes here on Commodities. 

Taxes on Imports.  Attempts to Limit China’s Exports by Raising Taxes here on Commodities.  11 29 2024

The cockeyed idea that you can control production from another country of commodities in demand worldwide by raising taxes on the import of these commodities is running into difficulties.  The idea that the American market can pressure China to produce less Electric Vehicles (EV’s)  and Solar Panels, by taxing imports; tariffs, seems to be an argument that without Americans to consume China’s production, they will be unable to sell their EV’s and solar panels. What this view lacks is the recognition that the production of high quality finished goods, which will easily find a market elsewhere, are making the taxes only bite the consumers, primarily American workers, who consume cheap Chinese products at Dollar Stores, WalMart, etc.   

The latest complaint is capitalist production cannot compete with China’s socialist system.

“China is too large to export its way to rapid growth and would benefit by reducing excess industrial capacity which is pressuring other economies, Yellen said in remarks to an audience of about 40 representatives of the American Chamber of Commerce in Guangzhou.”

“”Overcapacity isn’t a new problem, but it has intensified, and we’re seeing emerging risks in new sectors,” Yellen said in China’s southern export hub of Guangzhou, where she met with Vice Premier He Lifeng and Guangdong Province Governor Wang Weizhong.”

“Yellen and other Biden administration officials are growing increasingly concerned about China’s overproduction of electric vehicles, solar panels, semiconductors and other goods that are flooding into global markets in the face of a demand slump in China’s domestic market.”

Reuters 4 5 2024

“Chinese state media have pushed back against Yellen’s excess capacity message, saying it was an example of a double standard.”

“”While it is just basic economics that surplus products naturally seek out markets elsewhere once domestic demand is met, and Western nations have been doing that for centuries, when it comes to China, it becomes an ‘overcapacity problem’ threatening the world,” the China Daily said.” 

Ibid. Reuters

They really look silly telling China to produce less because the market in America cannot compete, and they are starting to refuse to buy the commodities to hurt China.  It’s like cutting off your nose to spite your face.   They are going to deliberately cause inflation with taxes on imports, taxes that will be paid by the consumer, often of products like solar panels for rooftops that have been acknowledged by them as effective to stop climate change.

What logic is it to not buy a cheap solar panel, just because the seller has decided to sell it below its value, the amount of labour time required to produce it?  Why should the buyer care? 

Creating a surplus is the basic rule of all capitalist production.  Suggesting China should not export so many products is a ridiculous request, given this is the overriding goal of capitalist production, to create surplus value.  Do as I say, not as I do.   

“Nov 29 (Reuters) – U.S. trade officials announced on Friday a new round of tariffs on solar panel imports from four Southeast Asian nations after American manufacturers complained that companies there are flooding the market with unfairly cheap goods.”

Article continues…

“According to a preliminary decision posted on the U.S. Commerce Department’s website on Friday, the agency calculated dumping duties of between 21.31% and 271.2%, depending on the company, on solar cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.”

“Most solar panels installed in the United States are made overseas, and some 80% of imports come from the four nations targeted in the Commerce Department probe.”

“President-elect Donald Trump has called the Inflation Reduction Act too expensive, but also has said he plans to slap hefty tariffs on a range of sectors to protect American workers.”

Reuters 11 29 2024

Trump said his favorite word was “tariffs”, and now he is becoming president again.  What he really means is his favorite word is actually “taxes”, because that’s what tariffs are, a tax on imports.  He already is trying to figure out what to do with the money from the taxes on imports, with lofty goals of being able to use it for his state.

Apparently there  is some contention about if the consumer will be paying these taxes.  They will, unless they purchase American made products, the old non metric, fossil fuel dependent production.   

Solar panels are becoming more out of reach to the worker daily.  China produces 80% of the panels, it is unlikely they will take a loss to sell their panels for less to compensate for the tariffs.  You will see inflation on panels, due to taxes levied by the bourgeoisie, who are not really committed to stopping climate change. 

It would be nice if solar panels were produced here, but instead the focus seems to still be on pumping as much fossil fuels as possible out of the ground, in the least amount of time. China seems to be rapidly becoming superior to American production of a key component of any renewable energy plans, the solar panel.   

China is already talking about putting their own tariffs on large gasoline powered engines, for cars and trucks.  This could get interesting.  How about a tax on non metric products? Imagine if they had to go metric to access foreign markets.

In all this taxing of imports it is the consumer who is going to pay.  This form of taxation will also bite the bourgeoisie, as Sam Walton owns WalMart, for instance, and will have to raise prices on Chinese products popular there due to tariffs.  And if those non metric gasoline large motor powered cars and trucks get tariffed, it could cause an economic crisis.

Most large scale production uses Chinese produced raw materials, for welding, for instance.  This is s tax on their own production; without the cheap welding supplies the commodities rise in value.  Will the bourgeois willingly make less profit to offset the taxes?   

Nicholas Jay B\oyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin 

American Democratic Republic

Technological Advancement and Material Conditions

Technological Advancement and Material  Conditions  

So what we seem to be seeing is what the new government is going to  be doing is to keep the old decaying industry functioning, regardless of its ecological impact.  The appointments Donald Trump has made are all involved with petroleum and fossil fuel production. Either that or they are inexperienced, and will take orders well.

What we can expect is, for instance, Milwaukee’s electrical generation will be remaining coal fired turbines, until Trump leaves office.  For a number of years Wisconsin Electric, the monopoly that sells natural gas and electricity to Southeastern WIsconsin, has talked about switching the Oak Creek power plant to gas. 

This now looks unlikely, regardless of the ecological effects of massive coal storage and burning.  Simply put, the Republican bourgeoisie will not have deep enough pockets to change the turbines to gas.

It also looks like gasoline powered large engines for autos, boats, etc. will be here to stay.  Trump has said he will tariff, or tax, Chinese electric vehicles (EV”S). The current government has already increased for this year 100% tariffs on electric vehicles, a 25% tariff on lithium-ion EV batteries and a 50% tariff on photovoltaic solar cells produced in China.

And this is not enough for Trump, he wants to increase taxes on imports, tariffs, even higher.

China has shown it can produce cheap quality EV’s that are competitive in the world market. They pollute the ecology far less than Detroit’s SUV and pickup trucks that use large gasoline powered engines.  The tax on imports of Chinese EV’s are designed to make Detroit’s products more competitive in the domestic market. 

Who wouldn’t want a cheap quality EV?  Why would a machine that can reduce the ecological impact of climate change not be welcomed?

China now produces 80% of the photovoltaic cells for solar energy.  At some point China decided to move forward industrially, went metric, and shifted to developing the latest technology.  All our bourgeoisie can do is tax imports from China to keep Americans buying Detroit’s gasoline powered large engine vehicles, and consuming fossil fuels for power generation. 

We expect it from Trump, but here is Biden doing it too.  These forms of protectionism are only going to get worse, and you can really see how non metric industry is simply not competitive.  China is still considered a third world country by the United Nations, and American can’t compete.  The statements to expect are something to the effect of “China, India and Russia are polluting the ecology, why should we be held to a different standard?”

Which reduces us to the standards of a declining capitalist model, like Russia, without recycling; or India and China, that are in the developing world. 

How far we have come.  The days of glory are coming to an end; technological progress is changing society, and Detroit is still not metric.  The speed limit signs, the gas pumps, the size of containers at the store, are all not yet metric. 

And do you really expect Trump to do a metric conversion?  He doesn’t even believe climate change is real.  “Make America Great Again” includes inches, gallons, and feet.

Another 4 years without a metric conversion.  And this is supposed to be someone who understands basic economics.  

What this is going to do is fetter the productive forces even worse than they are currently. It will further isolate the workers and industry from the rest of the world.  Who is going to buy a large non metric gasoline powered motor pickup truck outside the domestic market?

Then there is the social conditions; Elon Musk, who invested more than 250 million dollars into getting Trump elected, is now coming to power.  His industry he owns is called Tesla, and produces luxury automobiles.  It is not part of regular commodity production, it is what the surplus value is spent on.  It does not produce a profit, rather it consumes profit.  A worker cannot afford Musk’s cars, they are for the bourgeoisie.  It is what the bourgeois spend their profits on, rather than an affordable car a  worker would consume. 

This and government contracts are how Musk has gained his wealth. Trump will steer more government contracts for space,. to Musk’s monopoly, complete with the knowledge of engineers who created the industry for NASA previously..

These are all part of what to expect around here for the next 4 years.  Buying a Detroit gasoline powered truck, not being able to afford a solar panel for the house, using gas and electricity instead of renewable energy….  The speed limit staying 70 miles per hour on the highway; purchasing gallons of gasoline for the car, etc.  Prepare yourself for it, it is coming.

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

Profit and Taxes.  Wages and Profit. 

Profit and Taxes.  Wages and Profit. 

Wages are the lowest that can be paid, remaining socially acceptable.  The unpaid section of the workday, the surplus value, essentially what profit, is where taxes are divided off from. Escaping from this reality seems to be what is desired now, by cutting taxes for the wealthy.

If you cut taxes from profit and shift it directly on the workers back,. the taxes still have to be paid for. Workers work longer hours, what Marx referred to as increasing the absolute surplus value.  But this too runs into resistance, as there are laws about how many hours workers are supposed to be able to work, 8 hours is the current one.

You have to work them overtime to make up for the loss of wages due to the tax   

Longer hours, a wage cut…  It makes one wonder where the support for this is coming from.

Privations by the proletariat would seem to be coming.  You cannot simply raise the amount of profit.  If you lower the amount of the taxes from profit the taxes have to come from somewhere.  

And as the only thing that creates profit is labour,: lowering taxes on the wealthy is the same thing as increasing the profit kept by the capitalist at the workers expense.  

Either the taxes are coming from the form of profit, or from making the worker privy to part of what was taken as surplus value directly by his employer by charging him yearly, like property taxes, or printing it on the paycheck as a deduction, it still comes from the worker. In either case, divided off of profit, or shifted on to the worker, the surplus value flows into the state.

The bourgeoisie claims the tax money as their own. Obviously for them it is part of their profit. State industry does not make a profit.  It is privatized when it can make a profit, we saw this with recycling.  Waste Management now runs the sorter. Money for the state can only come from taxes.

The wealthy can only cut taxes by increasing privations from its workers.  Surplus value from the worker is needed to maintain the capitalist state.  It is a bourgeois fantasy to massively defund the state. Perhaps some of the savings will come from the prisons, police, etc. whose social function becomes clear during unrest. Like that is going to happen. The whole purpose of the state from its inception is to keep the classes divided.

Perhaps it is more palatable to the bourgeoisie to consider taxing workers directly rather than making a profit and dividing it off to pay for the state.  But in the end, it is all the labor of the workers that has to pay this, out of the surplus value they have created thorough exploitation of their labour.

Nicholas Jay Boyes   

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic