Currency Devaluation.  Tariffs.  Disproportionate Representation of Large Landowners in the Senate. 2 12 2026

Currency Devaluation.  Tariffs.  Disproportionate Representation of Large Landowners in the Senate. 2 12 2026

In an attempt to pay off the debt, at 100% GDP, the dollar is being devalued.  It has fallen more than 10% since Trump took power, which  makes the value of the debt smaller as it is in dollars, and if the dollar is worth less nominally the value of the debt falls.

It is simple; a hundred dollars this year is worth $90 instead of 100$ when Trump took power.  Thus if you owed 100$, but the currency was devalued, you would only have to pay 90$ worth of debt in last year’s money.

We see the devaluation clearly when we look at gold prices on the market, up 70% in the past year.

Which points to a greater devaluation, and an attempt to stem losses by investing in a  more stable form of currency.   Silver too was up 130%, a remarkable example of the devaluation of the currency.

When the dollar is worth 10% less, the value of everything goes up 10% in price.  This would be part of  the real inflation rate, about 10% in Trump’s first year in office. A devalued currency also makes the value of wages go down, as more wages have to be paid for the same product as before the devaluation.

So wages have to rise, or workers undergo privations.  Wages must rise, the tariffs also cause  this.  The tariffs make American exports able to be sold for more money, as competitors’ products are raised in value, allowing American export products to rise in value.

It’s like the Corn laws in the 19th century, it made it so British exports of food were able to be sold for higher prices.  It made competition easier for British exports, by raising the cost of grain imported.

It was repealed in 1846, somewhat due to the Irish famine.  It was viewed as a free trade measure.

The combination of tariffs and a devalued dollar mean the  working class are being more heavily exploited, as wages real value fall 10%.  Combined with the rise in price of imported goods,  which are now being tariffed, wages must rise.  But what  if they don’t? It means more hours must be worked to achieve the same wage.  The burden is clearly riding on the proletariat. 

The bourgeoisie says that the tariffs costs will not be paid for by the consumer.  They suggest the cost will be paid for by the producer of the commodity.  In case they haven’t noticed, the price of everything is rising, while the currency keeps falling in value.  Clearly tariffs have risen the prices of commodities, the costs are being passed on to consumers.

The bond market in the form of the national debt may be a safe haven for investors.  As debt increases there may be surplus value to be gained by speculation on the state’s debt.  The assumption is it is going to be paid off, which is probably likely, but first the country’s debt rating may fall, leading to a crisis.  It is a risky venture.

Trump wants to lower the interest rate, making it easier for banks to raise capital.  This will effectively subsidise even greater segments of the economy, like the farm subsidies.

“The legislation Trump has called the One Big Beautiful Bill locked in more than $65 billion over 10 years in agricultural support programs.”

The Washington Post 12 28 2025

Large scale land ownership would be in question without the massive state expenditures of  big farms.   It seems to just be part of American agriculture, and political representation of the large landowners is large. They know Trump has deep pockets,  like the banks who benefit from  low interest rates.

It is the big banks who benefit from the lower interest rates, it allows them to raise capital easier.  Combine this with “too big to fail” legislation, you get a sure fire way to massively increase the power of the big banks.  Given the smaller banks are not “too big too fail”, you see monopoly capitalism brewing.  As the smaller banks fail, the big banks buy their assets for ridiculously low prices, consolidation of ownership on a massive scale. 

The penny being phased out is an obvious effect of devaluation of currency.  Stores were already not paying pennies as of 2026.  The penny is on its way out, the 50$ bill on the way in.

The combination of devaluation of the currency and tariffs makes workers have to work more hours to be able to have the same standard of living they would have had without devaluation and tariffs.   The large landowners benefit as they can export at higher prices due to the rise in the cost of food due to tariffs. But even with this, they still require massive money from the state to stay afloat.  

The corn laws were lifted, as the city had enough of supporting the large scale landowners.  A similar moment could be coming, the Senate will be where you will see it.  It is two senators a state, the large landowners disproportionately  weigh in on the city this way.  Structural change of the senate could be coming, as the cities suffer under the large landowners, represented by  two senators a state.  

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

2 12 2026

Taxes on Imports.  Attempts to Limit China’s Exports by Raising Taxes here on Commodities. 

Taxes on Imports.  Attempts to Limit China’s Exports by Raising Taxes here on Commodities.  11 29 2024

The cockeyed idea that you can control production from another country of commodities in demand worldwide by raising taxes on the import of these commodities is running into difficulties.  The idea that the American market can pressure China to produce less Electric Vehicles (EV’s)  and Solar Panels, by taxing imports; tariffs, seems to be an argument that without Americans to consume China’s production, they will be unable to sell their EV’s and solar panels. What this view lacks is the recognition that the production of high quality finished goods, which will easily find a market elsewhere, are making the taxes only bite the consumers, primarily American workers, who consume cheap Chinese products at Dollar Stores, WalMart, etc.   

The latest complaint is capitalist production cannot compete with China’s socialist system.

“China is too large to export its way to rapid growth and would benefit by reducing excess industrial capacity which is pressuring other economies, Yellen said in remarks to an audience of about 40 representatives of the American Chamber of Commerce in Guangzhou.”

“”Overcapacity isn’t a new problem, but it has intensified, and we’re seeing emerging risks in new sectors,” Yellen said in China’s southern export hub of Guangzhou, where she met with Vice Premier He Lifeng and Guangdong Province Governor Wang Weizhong.”

“Yellen and other Biden administration officials are growing increasingly concerned about China’s overproduction of electric vehicles, solar panels, semiconductors and other goods that are flooding into global markets in the face of a demand slump in China’s domestic market.”

Reuters 4 5 2024

“Chinese state media have pushed back against Yellen’s excess capacity message, saying it was an example of a double standard.”

“”While it is just basic economics that surplus products naturally seek out markets elsewhere once domestic demand is met, and Western nations have been doing that for centuries, when it comes to China, it becomes an ‘overcapacity problem’ threatening the world,” the China Daily said.” 

Ibid. Reuters

They really look silly telling China to produce less because the market in America cannot compete, and they are starting to refuse to buy the commodities to hurt China.  It’s like cutting off your nose to spite your face.   They are going to deliberately cause inflation with taxes on imports, taxes that will be paid by the consumer, often of products like solar panels for rooftops that have been acknowledged by them as effective to stop climate change.

What logic is it to not buy a cheap solar panel, just because the seller has decided to sell it below its value, the amount of labour time required to produce it?  Why should the buyer care? 

Creating a surplus is the basic rule of all capitalist production.  Suggesting China should not export so many products is a ridiculous request, given this is the overriding goal of capitalist production, to create surplus value.  Do as I say, not as I do.   

“Nov 29 (Reuters) – U.S. trade officials announced on Friday a new round of tariffs on solar panel imports from four Southeast Asian nations after American manufacturers complained that companies there are flooding the market with unfairly cheap goods.”

Article continues…

“According to a preliminary decision posted on the U.S. Commerce Department’s website on Friday, the agency calculated dumping duties of between 21.31% and 271.2%, depending on the company, on solar cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.”

“Most solar panels installed in the United States are made overseas, and some 80% of imports come from the four nations targeted in the Commerce Department probe.”

“President-elect Donald Trump has called the Inflation Reduction Act too expensive, but also has said he plans to slap hefty tariffs on a range of sectors to protect American workers.”

Reuters 11 29 2024

Trump said his favorite word was “tariffs”, and now he is becoming president again.  What he really means is his favorite word is actually “taxes”, because that’s what tariffs are, a tax on imports.  He already is trying to figure out what to do with the money from the taxes on imports, with lofty goals of being able to use it for his state.

Apparently there  is some contention about if the consumer will be paying these taxes.  They will, unless they purchase American made products, the old non metric, fossil fuel dependent production.   

Solar panels are becoming more out of reach to the worker daily.  China produces 80% of the panels, it is unlikely they will take a loss to sell their panels for less to compensate for the tariffs.  You will see inflation on panels, due to taxes levied by the bourgeoisie, who are not really committed to stopping climate change. 

It would be nice if solar panels were produced here, but instead the focus seems to still be on pumping as much fossil fuels as possible out of the ground, in the least amount of time. China seems to be rapidly becoming superior to American production of a key component of any renewable energy plans, the solar panel.   

China is already talking about putting their own tariffs on large gasoline powered engines, for cars and trucks.  This could get interesting.  How about a tax on non metric products? Imagine if they had to go metric to access foreign markets.

In all this taxing of imports it is the consumer who is going to pay.  This form of taxation will also bite the bourgeoisie, as Sam Walton owns WalMart, for instance, and will have to raise prices on Chinese products popular there due to tariffs.  And if those non metric gasoline large motor powered cars and trucks get tariffed, it could cause an economic crisis.

Most large scale production uses Chinese produced raw materials, for welding, for instance.  This is s tax on their own production; without the cheap welding supplies the commodities rise in value.  Will the bourgeois willingly make less profit to offset the taxes?   

Nicholas Jay B\oyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin 

American Democratic Republic

Technological Advancement and Material Conditions

Technological Advancement and Material  Conditions  

So what we seem to be seeing is what the new government is going to  be doing is to keep the old decaying industry functioning, regardless of its ecological impact.  The appointments Donald Trump has made are all involved with petroleum and fossil fuel production. Either that or they are inexperienced, and will take orders well.

What we can expect is, for instance, Milwaukee’s electrical generation will be remaining coal fired turbines, until Trump leaves office.  For a number of years Wisconsin Electric, the monopoly that sells natural gas and electricity to Southeastern WIsconsin, has talked about switching the Oak Creek power plant to gas. 

This now looks unlikely, regardless of the ecological effects of massive coal storage and burning.  Simply put, the Republican bourgeoisie will not have deep enough pockets to change the turbines to gas.

It also looks like gasoline powered large engines for autos, boats, etc. will be here to stay.  Trump has said he will tariff, or tax, Chinese electric vehicles (EV”S). The current government has already increased for this year 100% tariffs on electric vehicles, a 25% tariff on lithium-ion EV batteries and a 50% tariff on photovoltaic solar cells produced in China.

And this is not enough for Trump, he wants to increase taxes on imports, tariffs, even higher.

China has shown it can produce cheap quality EV’s that are competitive in the world market. They pollute the ecology far less than Detroit’s SUV and pickup trucks that use large gasoline powered engines.  The tax on imports of Chinese EV’s are designed to make Detroit’s products more competitive in the domestic market. 

Who wouldn’t want a cheap quality EV?  Why would a machine that can reduce the ecological impact of climate change not be welcomed?

China now produces 80% of the photovoltaic cells for solar energy.  At some point China decided to move forward industrially, went metric, and shifted to developing the latest technology.  All our bourgeoisie can do is tax imports from China to keep Americans buying Detroit’s gasoline powered large engine vehicles, and consuming fossil fuels for power generation. 

We expect it from Trump, but here is Biden doing it too.  These forms of protectionism are only going to get worse, and you can really see how non metric industry is simply not competitive.  China is still considered a third world country by the United Nations, and American can’t compete.  The statements to expect are something to the effect of “China, India and Russia are polluting the ecology, why should we be held to a different standard?”

Which reduces us to the standards of a declining capitalist model, like Russia, without recycling; or India and China, that are in the developing world. 

How far we have come.  The days of glory are coming to an end; technological progress is changing society, and Detroit is still not metric.  The speed limit signs, the gas pumps, the size of containers at the store, are all not yet metric. 

And do you really expect Trump to do a metric conversion?  He doesn’t even believe climate change is real.  “Make America Great Again” includes inches, gallons, and feet.

Another 4 years without a metric conversion.  And this is supposed to be someone who understands basic economics.  

What this is going to do is fetter the productive forces even worse than they are currently. It will further isolate the workers and industry from the rest of the world.  Who is going to buy a large non metric gasoline powered motor pickup truck outside the domestic market?

Then there is the social conditions; Elon Musk, who invested more than 250 million dollars into getting Trump elected, is now coming to power.  His industry he owns is called Tesla, and produces luxury automobiles.  It is not part of regular commodity production, it is what the surplus value is spent on.  It does not produce a profit, rather it consumes profit.  A worker cannot afford Musk’s cars, they are for the bourgeoisie.  It is what the bourgeois spend their profits on, rather than an affordable car a  worker would consume. 

This and government contracts are how Musk has gained his wealth. Trump will steer more government contracts for space,. to Musk’s monopoly, complete with the knowledge of engineers who created the industry for NASA previously..

These are all part of what to expect around here for the next 4 years.  Buying a Detroit gasoline powered truck, not being able to afford a solar panel for the house, using gas and electricity instead of renewable energy….  The speed limit staying 70 miles per hour on the highway; purchasing gallons of gasoline for the car, etc.  Prepare yourself for it, it is coming.

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic