Supreme Court Decision Returns Power of the Purse to Congress. 2 23 2026

Supreme Court Decision Returns Power of the Purse to Congress

With a single court decision by the Supreme Court, Donald Trump and his constant threat of  tariffs was ended.  The decision was in a court that rarely rules in favor of the worker, where a number of judges were appointed by Trump, 3 in his first term when he assumed power without a majority.  It was a 6 to 3 decision.

That is what makes this ruling so remarkable.

“The blockbuster Supreme Court ruling that invalidated President Donald Trump’s emergency tariffs ends one chapter of economic uncertainty….”

“Even as the nation’s high court determined Friday that the president had exceeded his authority by slapping tariffs on goods from just about every country in the world, Trump made clear at a White House news conference that he was determined to do so again, though this time within the bounds of the law.”

“The justices’ 6-3 ruling said the president did not have the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose a vast array of import levies on goods from nearly all of the nation’s trading partners.”

Washington Post 2 22 2026

All the Supreme said was taxation was the responsibility of Congress; Congress holds the purse strings of government.  As tariffs are a form of taxes; taxes on imports, Congress  has to be where tariffs start and stop.

Immediately following the ruling Trump raised global taxes 15%.  It is like cutting off your nose to sprite your face. 

The next question is how to pay back the tariffs already taken in, 134 billion dollars, which will have to be paid back to the importers who paid tax in the first place.  Given they are all American based brokers, or American companies, they don’t have far to go.   

Trump has promised to use court to delay reimbursing the importers he tariffed, who are now all clamoring for their money back.

The tax man has been rebuked; his constant threats of tariffs now will take months to come in effect, instead of a social media post of a shout on an airplane to a reporter.

Congress is the responsible party when taxes rise. They never fall, even in periods of prosperity.  Nevertheless they are still in control, and reminded us they had the power to use the court to clip Don’s wings.  Without tax threats Don is a loud voice with no real clout behind him.

““The President asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope,” Roberts wrote. “In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorization to exercise it.””

“Trump cannot, Roberts wrote.”

“Roberts pointed out IEEPA made no mention of tariffs and that he could find little in the law to authorize such massive levies, writing bluntly: “Those words cannot bear such weight.”

“He also said Trump’s move ran afoul of the “major questions doctrine,” a rule the court has enunciated in recent years that holds that any presidential action that has major economic or political ramifications must have explicit authorization by Congress.”

“The stakes of the ruling are enormous: The tariffs affect trillions of dollars in trade, and the government collected nearly $134 billion in levies through Dec. 14 under the authority challenged in the case.”

Washington Post ibid.

Perhaps they have been saving the 134 billion dollars, in case something like this happened?  Otherwise it means more taxes on top of what is paid the importer, considering the consumer paid the bulk of the taxes, the tariffs taxes on imports.

Expect export commodities value to fall, as the tariffs made their value higher than what they would have been without the tax.  BYD vs Ford is not here yet, but is getting closer.  

Without protectionism it is questionable how many nonmetric products will be competitive in the world market.  With the declining value of the dollar nominally more will have to be paid by the consumer for the same product, inflation.  Exports were balanced with heavy taxation on competitors’ products, to make American products more competitive.  

The global tax of 15% he has now levied for 150 days seems less personal than the normal tariff for Dons crotchets.  This one is not directed at a single competitor, rather the whole world market.  It sort of admits non metric production will  never be able to compete in the world market. 

Some of the tariffs were on Cuba, the other country adjacent to Mar a Lago, Trump’s palace.  He cut off their oil,will he return the tariff money now illegal?

How embarrassing.  The taxman, who raised everyone’s taxes by heavily taxing imports, now has to contend with Congress.  What happens if Don tries to use tariffs again?  Will the Supreme Court change their mind? Will they have too? They made it crystal clear taxes are Congress’s responsibility, and Trump is president, not congress. 

We will be in for an interesting spectacle when the 134 billion dollars have to be paid back.  They could devalue the currency further, another 10% next year as this makes the debt  normally worth less in real labor time.  This surplus value has already been paid for by the consumer in the form of higher prices.  Now another 134 billion on top of this?

It’s that or the capitalist is honest enough to lower the prices on his goods due to being repaid the tariff. This scenario looks unlikely.

In the end this exercise results in massive inflation, the price of everything has been going through the roof under Don.  The leverage of tariffs as punishment has limits.  Congress does own the purse strings of government, it has been that way since founding.  All this did was test the boundaries of what can happen if the Republican bourgeoisie have control of both houses of Congress and the president. Clearly it was chaos.

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

2 23 2026

Currency Devaluation.  Tariffs.  Disproportionate Representation of Large Landowners in the Senate. 2 12 2026

Currency Devaluation.  Tariffs.  Disproportionate Representation of Large Landowners in the Senate. 2 12 2026

In an attempt to pay off the debt, at 100% GDP, the dollar is being devalued.  It has fallen more than 10% since Trump took power, which  makes the value of the debt smaller as it is in dollars, and if the dollar is worth less nominally the value of the debt falls.

It is simple; a hundred dollars this year is worth $90 instead of 100$ when Trump took power.  Thus if you owed 100$, but the currency was devalued, you would only have to pay 90$ worth of debt in last year’s money.

We see the devaluation clearly when we look at gold prices on the market, up 70% in the past year.

Which points to a greater devaluation, and an attempt to stem losses by investing in a  more stable form of currency.   Silver too was up 130%, a remarkable example of the devaluation of the currency.

When the dollar is worth 10% less, the value of everything goes up 10% in price.  This would be part of  the real inflation rate, about 10% in Trump’s first year in office. A devalued currency also makes the value of wages go down, as more wages have to be paid for the same product as before the devaluation.

So wages have to rise, or workers undergo privations.  Wages must rise, the tariffs also cause  this.  The tariffs make American exports able to be sold for more money, as competitors’ products are raised in value, allowing American export products to rise in value.

It’s like the Corn laws in the 19th century, it made it so British exports of food were able to be sold for higher prices.  It made competition easier for British exports, by raising the cost of grain imported.

It was repealed in 1846, somewhat due to the Irish famine.  It was viewed as a free trade measure.

The combination of tariffs and a devalued dollar mean the  working class are being more heavily exploited, as wages real value fall 10%.  Combined with the rise in price of imported goods,  which are now being tariffed, wages must rise.  But what  if they don’t? It means more hours must be worked to achieve the same wage.  The burden is clearly riding on the proletariat. 

The bourgeoisie says that the tariffs costs will not be paid for by the consumer.  They suggest the cost will be paid for by the producer of the commodity.  In case they haven’t noticed, the price of everything is rising, while the currency keeps falling in value.  Clearly tariffs have risen the prices of commodities, the costs are being passed on to consumers.

The bond market in the form of the national debt may be a safe haven for investors.  As debt increases there may be surplus value to be gained by speculation on the state’s debt.  The assumption is it is going to be paid off, which is probably likely, but first the country’s debt rating may fall, leading to a crisis.  It is a risky venture.

Trump wants to lower the interest rate, making it easier for banks to raise capital.  This will effectively subsidise even greater segments of the economy, like the farm subsidies.

“The legislation Trump has called the One Big Beautiful Bill locked in more than $65 billion over 10 years in agricultural support programs.”

The Washington Post 12 28 2025

Large scale land ownership would be in question without the massive state expenditures of  big farms.   It seems to just be part of American agriculture, and political representation of the large landowners is large. They know Trump has deep pockets,  like the banks who benefit from  low interest rates.

It is the big banks who benefit from the lower interest rates, it allows them to raise capital easier.  Combine this with “too big to fail” legislation, you get a sure fire way to massively increase the power of the big banks.  Given the smaller banks are not “too big too fail”, you see monopoly capitalism brewing.  As the smaller banks fail, the big banks buy their assets for ridiculously low prices, consolidation of ownership on a massive scale. 

The penny being phased out is an obvious effect of devaluation of currency.  Stores were already not paying pennies as of 2026.  The penny is on its way out, the 50$ bill on the way in.

The combination of devaluation of the currency and tariffs makes workers have to work more hours to be able to have the same standard of living they would have had without devaluation and tariffs.   The large landowners benefit as they can export at higher prices due to the rise in the cost of food due to tariffs. But even with this, they still require massive money from the state to stay afloat.  

The corn laws were lifted, as the city had enough of supporting the large scale landowners.  A similar moment could be coming, the Senate will be where you will see it.  It is two senators a state, the large landowners disproportionately  weigh in on the city this way.  Structural change of the senate could be coming, as the cities suffer under the large landowners, represented by  two senators a state.  

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

2 12 2026

Donald Trump and his Past

The Jeffery Epstein case, of the man with the harem visited by many wealthy Americans, as well as British royalty, is still ongoing. Bill and Hillary Clinton are testifying soon on their connection  to Epstein, who was made into a sex offender in 2008 for taking advantage of a 14 year old girl.

There have been other people in the case, and if it were not for Epstein’s death by suicide in jail, there would be more.

At this point Donald Trump, according to Epstein. knew about the girls Epstein was trafficking.  Trump still stayed friends with Epstein, but we have yet to hear anyone fingering out Trump as having used teen prostitutes.  

It is like a freemasonry of sorts.  All Bill Clinton has to do is tell us what everyone believes to be the truth, Trump was using Epstein’s women.

Instead reputational damage to the Clinton  legacy is all the bourgeois press publishes.  Clearly the secrets Epstein kept are part of a freemasonry that extends beyond party lines, into a secretive world of privately owned islands, private jet travel, an estate in Manhattan,etc.

The royal Prince Andrew, now no longer prince due to his involvement with Epstein,  could also incriminate Trump if he would testify before Congress,

But none of these things will come to pass.  The bourgeoisie will not break their secret relationship with Trump and Epstein.   It is beyond party lines, it is some sort of strange brotherhood; a world of billionaires whose wealth does not just buy a diamond, or a luxury car.  Rather it carries the ability to take advantage of young girls, often underage, for sex.

Epstein was a billionaire; an investor in New York, who knew Trump well. Only a fool could not have known about the payments to the underage girls, the massages etc. The pictures relating to Trump; his name on condoms distributed  to guests, with his arm around a young girl all show what everyone knows, Trump is guilty,

But it will not come from Clinton, or any other bourgeois that Trump is guilty.  And even if found guilty, Trump will just lie about his involvement with Epstein, as he has repeatedly done up to now.  The bourgeoisie if nothing else guards its members from public embarrassment and legal repercussions from lifestyles that are scandalous.  

No there will  be no justice.   Millions of pages of documents are still not available, even after lawsuits saying they should be released.  800,000 pages have been redacted.  Trump will not have to answer to his crimes.

I guess it sort of comes with the territory of being a casino owner to have ties with characters like Epstein.  All the gambling, and prostitution that usually goes with it, at least if you’re in Vegas, is still a big part of Don;s persona.  He owned casinos first and foremost.  His wife was an escort, a woman he paid to take out on a “date”. She was a pornographic model from Czech Republic.  She finds the title prostitute offensive. 

Don has always been involved in pornography, and gave $130,000 to porn actress Stormy Daniels to keep her quiet.  Don paid her in 3 checks, yet still denies knowing her.

Justice could be done if Clinton would come clear about what he knows.  But bourgeois freemasonry about Epstein looks too powerful to stop.  Prince Andrew also will not testify to Congress; he feels he is too important to have to answer to the public in the country he chose to use teenage girls for sex in.

Having wealth clearly does not mean having superior morality.  The whole affair of where profit comes from already contains the freemasonry; we are supposed to believe wealth comes from the exchange of commodities, rather than seeing capital as a social relationship between worker and capitalist. Now we see the exploitation of the worker goes beyond working part of the day unpaid.  Her young body is bought and sold in universal prostitution, and the conspiracy extends well into the bourgeoisie.  

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

2 4 2026

Civil Unrest in Minneapolis.  Trump Chooses Violence to Deal With Protestors.

Civil Unrest in Minneapolis.  Trump Chooses Violence to Deal With Protestors.

Well by now everybody  has seen the videos of another death by police in Minneapolis, by individuals connected to the state.   The footage by cellphone shows the man, Alex Pretti, approached officers beating a man, and tried to record it on his cell phone.  The police response was swift, firing 10 shots at Pretti, who was caught up in the chaos, leaving him dead.

The first fibs from the Trump administration was he approached  the officers with a gun drawn.  Well after seeing peoples footage who were watching and filming, it became clear Pretti, although armed with a gun, had it holstered.  Rather he had his cell phone out when he was beaten and shot by riot police. 

It is legal to carry a gun in Minneapolis to a demonstration, WIsconsin has similar laws. We saw this with Kyle Rittenhouse,when it was legal for him to not only carry a gun in Kenosha, but to kill 2 people in the demonstration, and cripple a third. 

Regardless of what  one may think is proper, with some Republican bourgeois trying to say it is illegal to come to the demonstration armed, the right to join a militia in the second amendment of the constitution should lay waste to this concern.

They made their bed now they can sleep in it.  All those years of arguments for less gun control, only to suggest it was illegal for Pertti to have a gun on him. If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out. 

If Trump wanted to help local law enforcement, he could have just increased spending on Milwaukee PD.  You would think this would be the first thing he would do; logically to stop a crime problem use the police.

Instead Don has called out the National Guard, ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement), DHS (department of homeland security), etc,  supposedly to help police in lawless cities.

Instead we see films of ICE killing our countrymen, and it is a worry people will just get hardened to seeing this and soon it will soon not bother them so much.   

It is still a mystery who constitutes the federal government, who trains them, and where they came from to Minneapolis.  What is clear is these are Trump’s men, and are loyal to him.  He is responsible for  his troops like any other commander in the Army.  The buck stops there.

Trump seems to have no guilty conscience, and it would be a surprise if he was to call and talk to Pretti’s  family, and apologize.  Don is not the apology type. He still stubbornly refuses to let  even the local police investigate the shooting of Pretti.

Minneapolis is a day trip by car from Milwaukee.  Chicago is closer to Milwaukee, but Minneapolis is basically the next stop after Milwaukee on the train.  All we can do is hope Trump will not start calling Milwaukee “woke” and send in ICE next.

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

1 26 2026

When Fantasy Meets With Reality

With both houses of Congress, and the president all being in the same political party, the Republicans,  it would seem to be now that the bold moves would take place. Given the Republican bourgeoisie always preaches less government, and less taxes, just now has this unfolded?

Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, just attempted to gut the state. They removed thousands of state workers and officials, in what was an attempt to pay off the national debt, which stands at 34.2 trillion dollars. It costs about a trillion dollars a year in interest.  This money comes from taxes, through the more mysterious bond borrowing by the Central Bank.  They buy money, to pay off expenses of the state, and the interest is paid for by taxes.

The Central Bank are indebting the state, and the bourgeois speculate on the ability of the state to be able to pay off its debts.

Musk’s effort seemed bold, and he promised to cut 2 trillion dollars from the state.   

But then, things started to unfold that contradicted the Republican message we were so used to hearing about; how fat the state was, and how the assets of the state could be made private property.  Musk started issuing to state offices and state industry ultimatums regarding their employment.  

Musk really believed the Republican bourgeoisie, and attempted to gut the state.   Things started to unravel though, and 2 trillion dollars became 1 trillion dollars.  State workers really were losing their jobs, but it was becoming clear the state employees were there to help  the bourgeois run industry that was needed but could not create a profit.  The state industry could not be sold off to private businessmen,  it turned out the state could not shrink in size much smaller than it already was, without causing civil unrest.

2 trillion went to 1 trillion, and at the end of Musk’s official work to make the state smaller, he saved about 150 billion dollars a year.  This was about a half a percentage point of the expenditures of the state for 2024.  This is about one sixth the size of the interest payments the bonds issued this year are paying.

Then Trump’s efforts at legislation, his budget “big Beautiful Bill” he was trying to pass,  would indebt the state  2.4 trillion to 5 trillion dollars in 5 years.  

So lowering taxes was fiction. 

The massive tariffs also followed Republican leadership, taxes on imports.  It’s simple; the importer buys a foreign product.  When it arrives at the dock,  the importer receives his receipt, with the tax on the purchase displayed on the bottom.  In this case it is the tariff that is the tax, paid for by the importer.  It is like Sales Tax, paid by the purchaser of the product, in this case the importer.  

So much for lowering taxes.  As far as the consumer goes, for instance WalMart has said prices there will be rising due to tariffs.  Trump has said WalMart should make less profit, simply “eating the cost of the tariffs”.  But stores like WalMart, where the proletariat shops, already were stretched to make a profit, having to compete with other stores like online giant Amazon.  Amazon also has said prices are rising, due to tariffs.  

The taxes from Trump on imports, whose Republicans preached about the “tax and spend” culture of Washington constantly to get elected, showed the latter was also fiction.  At best they passed on the taxes to the next generation, by which time the next president will have to pay off the debt, or default.

Moody’s credit ratings are used to assess the creditworthiness of debt issuers, providing investors with insights into the likelihood of default and financial loss.  The repayment of obligations is what is key here,  and on May 16, 2025,  Moody’s Ratings (Moody’s) downgraded the Government of United States of America’s long-term issuer and senior unsecured ratings to Aa1 from Aaa and changed the outlook to stable from negative.

This was the last credit ratings organization to downgrade the government’s credit rating, the others already concluded default by the bourgeoisie on its debts is a risk worthy of a downgrade.

Yet Trump kept suggesting the taxes he created on imports would help pay off the debts.   But it was a drop in the bucket compared to the 32 trillion dollars owed by the government for its debts.

At this point Musk began sensing he had been made on ass of,  and left the government.  He would have a falling out with the president he paid 260 million dollars of his money to elect.  It started getting ugly on social media, with Musk going so far as to suggest Trump should be impeached.

Trump then said Musk had a drug problem, which would explain why he was so easily taken when he heard the state was too fat, and its assets could be privatised. 

I guess the only real question is why there are some who believe the economy has been helped by Trump and his Republicans.  He threatened 150% taxes on Chinese imports. He backed off, but it remains about 50% on imports from China.

Trump is the taxman.  And he is this with complete control of Congress, Senate and House.  Perhaps the only question is is this not exactly what happens when the bourgeoisie has total control the state?

Nicholas Jay Boyes

MIlwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

9 17 2025

Taxes on Imports.  Attempts to Limit China’s Exports by Raising Taxes here on Commodities. 

Taxes on Imports.  Attempts to Limit China’s Exports by Raising Taxes here on Commodities.  11 29 2024

The cockeyed idea that you can control production from another country of commodities in demand worldwide by raising taxes on the import of these commodities is running into difficulties.  The idea that the American market can pressure China to produce less Electric Vehicles (EV’s)  and Solar Panels, by taxing imports; tariffs, seems to be an argument that without Americans to consume China’s production, they will be unable to sell their EV’s and solar panels. What this view lacks is the recognition that the production of high quality finished goods, which will easily find a market elsewhere, are making the taxes only bite the consumers, primarily American workers, who consume cheap Chinese products at Dollar Stores, WalMart, etc.   

The latest complaint is capitalist production cannot compete with China’s socialist system.

“China is too large to export its way to rapid growth and would benefit by reducing excess industrial capacity which is pressuring other economies, Yellen said in remarks to an audience of about 40 representatives of the American Chamber of Commerce in Guangzhou.”

“”Overcapacity isn’t a new problem, but it has intensified, and we’re seeing emerging risks in new sectors,” Yellen said in China’s southern export hub of Guangzhou, where she met with Vice Premier He Lifeng and Guangdong Province Governor Wang Weizhong.”

“Yellen and other Biden administration officials are growing increasingly concerned about China’s overproduction of electric vehicles, solar panels, semiconductors and other goods that are flooding into global markets in the face of a demand slump in China’s domestic market.”

Reuters 4 5 2024

“Chinese state media have pushed back against Yellen’s excess capacity message, saying it was an example of a double standard.”

“”While it is just basic economics that surplus products naturally seek out markets elsewhere once domestic demand is met, and Western nations have been doing that for centuries, when it comes to China, it becomes an ‘overcapacity problem’ threatening the world,” the China Daily said.” 

Ibid. Reuters

They really look silly telling China to produce less because the market in America cannot compete, and they are starting to refuse to buy the commodities to hurt China.  It’s like cutting off your nose to spite your face.   They are going to deliberately cause inflation with taxes on imports, taxes that will be paid by the consumer, often of products like solar panels for rooftops that have been acknowledged by them as effective to stop climate change.

What logic is it to not buy a cheap solar panel, just because the seller has decided to sell it below its value, the amount of labour time required to produce it?  Why should the buyer care? 

Creating a surplus is the basic rule of all capitalist production.  Suggesting China should not export so many products is a ridiculous request, given this is the overriding goal of capitalist production, to create surplus value.  Do as I say, not as I do.   

“Nov 29 (Reuters) – U.S. trade officials announced on Friday a new round of tariffs on solar panel imports from four Southeast Asian nations after American manufacturers complained that companies there are flooding the market with unfairly cheap goods.”

Article continues…

“According to a preliminary decision posted on the U.S. Commerce Department’s website on Friday, the agency calculated dumping duties of between 21.31% and 271.2%, depending on the company, on solar cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.”

“Most solar panels installed in the United States are made overseas, and some 80% of imports come from the four nations targeted in the Commerce Department probe.”

“President-elect Donald Trump has called the Inflation Reduction Act too expensive, but also has said he plans to slap hefty tariffs on a range of sectors to protect American workers.”

Reuters 11 29 2024

Trump said his favorite word was “tariffs”, and now he is becoming president again.  What he really means is his favorite word is actually “taxes”, because that’s what tariffs are, a tax on imports.  He already is trying to figure out what to do with the money from the taxes on imports, with lofty goals of being able to use it for his state.

Apparently there  is some contention about if the consumer will be paying these taxes.  They will, unless they purchase American made products, the old non metric, fossil fuel dependent production.   

Solar panels are becoming more out of reach to the worker daily.  China produces 80% of the panels, it is unlikely they will take a loss to sell their panels for less to compensate for the tariffs.  You will see inflation on panels, due to taxes levied by the bourgeoisie, who are not really committed to stopping climate change. 

It would be nice if solar panels were produced here, but instead the focus seems to still be on pumping as much fossil fuels as possible out of the ground, in the least amount of time. China seems to be rapidly becoming superior to American production of a key component of any renewable energy plans, the solar panel.   

China is already talking about putting their own tariffs on large gasoline powered engines, for cars and trucks.  This could get interesting.  How about a tax on non metric products? Imagine if they had to go metric to access foreign markets.

In all this taxing of imports it is the consumer who is going to pay.  This form of taxation will also bite the bourgeoisie, as Sam Walton owns WalMart, for instance, and will have to raise prices on Chinese products popular there due to tariffs.  And if those non metric gasoline large motor powered cars and trucks get tariffed, it could cause an economic crisis.

Most large scale production uses Chinese produced raw materials, for welding, for instance.  This is s tax on their own production; without the cheap welding supplies the commodities rise in value.  Will the bourgeois willingly make less profit to offset the taxes?   

Nicholas Jay B\oyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin 

American Democratic Republic

Technological Advancement and Material Conditions

Technological Advancement and Material  Conditions  

So what we seem to be seeing is what the new government is going to  be doing is to keep the old decaying industry functioning, regardless of its ecological impact.  The appointments Donald Trump has made are all involved with petroleum and fossil fuel production. Either that or they are inexperienced, and will take orders well.

What we can expect is, for instance, Milwaukee’s electrical generation will be remaining coal fired turbines, until Trump leaves office.  For a number of years Wisconsin Electric, the monopoly that sells natural gas and electricity to Southeastern WIsconsin, has talked about switching the Oak Creek power plant to gas. 

This now looks unlikely, regardless of the ecological effects of massive coal storage and burning.  Simply put, the Republican bourgeoisie will not have deep enough pockets to change the turbines to gas.

It also looks like gasoline powered large engines for autos, boats, etc. will be here to stay.  Trump has said he will tariff, or tax, Chinese electric vehicles (EV”S). The current government has already increased for this year 100% tariffs on electric vehicles, a 25% tariff on lithium-ion EV batteries and a 50% tariff on photovoltaic solar cells produced in China.

And this is not enough for Trump, he wants to increase taxes on imports, tariffs, even higher.

China has shown it can produce cheap quality EV’s that are competitive in the world market. They pollute the ecology far less than Detroit’s SUV and pickup trucks that use large gasoline powered engines.  The tax on imports of Chinese EV’s are designed to make Detroit’s products more competitive in the domestic market. 

Who wouldn’t want a cheap quality EV?  Why would a machine that can reduce the ecological impact of climate change not be welcomed?

China now produces 80% of the photovoltaic cells for solar energy.  At some point China decided to move forward industrially, went metric, and shifted to developing the latest technology.  All our bourgeoisie can do is tax imports from China to keep Americans buying Detroit’s gasoline powered large engine vehicles, and consuming fossil fuels for power generation. 

We expect it from Trump, but here is Biden doing it too.  These forms of protectionism are only going to get worse, and you can really see how non metric industry is simply not competitive.  China is still considered a third world country by the United Nations, and American can’t compete.  The statements to expect are something to the effect of “China, India and Russia are polluting the ecology, why should we be held to a different standard?”

Which reduces us to the standards of a declining capitalist model, like Russia, without recycling; or India and China, that are in the developing world. 

How far we have come.  The days of glory are coming to an end; technological progress is changing society, and Detroit is still not metric.  The speed limit signs, the gas pumps, the size of containers at the store, are all not yet metric. 

And do you really expect Trump to do a metric conversion?  He doesn’t even believe climate change is real.  “Make America Great Again” includes inches, gallons, and feet.

Another 4 years without a metric conversion.  And this is supposed to be someone who understands basic economics.  

What this is going to do is fetter the productive forces even worse than they are currently. It will further isolate the workers and industry from the rest of the world.  Who is going to buy a large non metric gasoline powered motor pickup truck outside the domestic market?

Then there is the social conditions; Elon Musk, who invested more than 250 million dollars into getting Trump elected, is now coming to power.  His industry he owns is called Tesla, and produces luxury automobiles.  It is not part of regular commodity production, it is what the surplus value is spent on.  It does not produce a profit, rather it consumes profit.  A worker cannot afford Musk’s cars, they are for the bourgeoisie.  It is what the bourgeois spend their profits on, rather than an affordable car a  worker would consume. 

This and government contracts are how Musk has gained his wealth. Trump will steer more government contracts for space,. to Musk’s monopoly, complete with the knowledge of engineers who created the industry for NASA previously..

These are all part of what to expect around here for the next 4 years.  Buying a Detroit gasoline powered truck, not being able to afford a solar panel for the house, using gas and electricity instead of renewable energy….  The speed limit staying 70 miles per hour on the highway; purchasing gallons of gasoline for the car, etc.  Prepare yourself for it, it is coming.

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic