Capitalism and the War Machine.  Technological Evolution of Warfare to Capitalism. 7 17 2026

Capitalism and the War Machine.  Technological Evolution of Warfare to Capitalism. 7 17 2026

If we look at the evolution of modern capitalist warfare, drone technology and missiles capable of shooting down missiles have totally changed society.  The one way drone aircraft, primarily developed by Iran, based on a design of a more sophisticated two way drone brought down a little more than a decade ago, has been used in Ukraine, where the most high tech weapons are being used in a fight between Russia and America’s proxies.

It has gotten to the point Germany has decided not to cooperate on a new generation of fighter jet aircraft with France.  They have not publicly cited a reason for this, but what should be obvious is jets are getting shot down by Russia.  They can hardly even fire a missile at Russia without it being shot down, no less a manned aircraft.

It is so impossible to use fighter jets there that drones are the main means of warfare, that is in the trenches.  But the camera on the drone, combined with satellite tracking systems, primarily the one built by Elon Musk, the star link internet connections, have proved, in combination with long range ballistic missiles fired by Ukraine, to hit targets in Russia often a thousand kilometers or more from  Russia’s borders to Kiev.  

But without Starlink, Ukraine has little hope of defeating Russia. The drones are totally reliant on it.   The missiles too are part of the machine.

It is remarkable though to see the failure of jet aircraft, which Russia also owns, to be of any help in a front line condition where any movement of individuals or small groups face drone attacks by both parties.

The Patriot missiles proved effective in stopping missiles fired at Kiev, but at a cost of a million dollars a missile has left Kiev unable to stop Russian missiles.  But the presence of these systems have made airplanes a failure in this new form of warfare. Ukraine now wants to produce their own, but Germany gave up on it as it was too costly and difficult to produce without American engineering. 

The peace movement was focused on American and the Soviet Union learning to live with each other.  Groups like Greenpeace showed ecological cooperation was required, but what did the bourgeoisie do?  Remove the socialists from power, now violently in Ukraine.   They can’t even get along with Vladimir Putin, a capitalist oligarch himself. Apparently he is too far left for the reactionary bourgeoisie in Germany. 

Donald Trump has had success with aircraft technology in the developing world, in Venezuela for instance. The coup de tet has given  America a new colony there. 

After Trump’s success in Venezuela  he felt he could handle Iran. But even in Iran the aircraft keep getting destroyed.  They have lost 50 or more, some in flight, others parked on the ground.  Given its close proximity to what was the Iron Curtain,  they have missile defenses.  They also have missile and drone technology capable of stopping Chevron and ExxonMobil from mining oil and shipping it in the region.

If anything Iran should prove that even with a sophisticated air bombing campaign, air power will not dislodge Iran’s leadership from power.  If anything it empowered them to fight  back, with missiles and drones.  

But what has really been strange is how easy it was to shut off the strait of Hormuz, where massive amounts of oil were flowing from Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia.  It is shut again, Iran controls it.  The shipping companies cannot insure the ships,  it costs a lot of money to use ships in war zones, the companies usually avoid bad areas with ships worth tens of millions of dollars. 

Iran is limited though as they have not found a way to attack the nuclear powered aircraft carriers with drones.  Without a sophisticated Navy they have yet to sink a big ship.  But the aircraft get hit sometimes now that  the war has been going on, and large ships and drone technology seem to be on a collision course.  Ukraine is using missiles to destroy Russian grain shipments, it is proving to be easy to target large vessels, which could face the fate of war aircraft, if Iran can build the missiles to do it.

The Saudis are shipping oil through the Red Sea, but Iran’s friends the Houthi rebels are even making this harder, contesting control of the Red sea by the Saudis.  What drone warfare has shown is just how vulnerable petroleum production is to small explosives on drones.

Iran knew this, and was prepared to hit petroleum production in their region, striking Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain ,with missiles, crippling their now privately owned oil shipping and production.  They are cutting off access by the bourgeoisie to conquered territory in Iraq, where money was being made for the  home country after several wars that removed nationalized oil. But without stable shipping; with ground transport of Iraq’s oil basically impossible, oil must move through the strait of Hormuz. 

Thus the embargo on Iran’s ports by America, in a conflict that looked solved until Trump and Iran again started fighting.  One thing should be clear, America’s nuclear weapons have been of no assistance in Iran.  This should teach the Iranians that nuclear weapons are a crutch not an asset.  And reject building nuclear weapons.

Even with little or no drones or aircraft of any kind Afghanistan removed the American bourgeoisie.  It took 20 years, but America was conquered there.  No nuclear weapons were used, they were of no help. 

The only option is to stop producing jet fighter aircraft.  They are only effective in the developing world, where the primitive conditions do not include antimissile defenses.  Trump is living in a fantasy world if he thinks by air bombing Iran they are going to give in.  They are shooting down the F35’s, we saw the pictures at the beginning of the war there, the crashing down airplanes.  Short of a ground invasion, in a large new Middle Eastern war, Trump looks destined for failure in Iran.

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

7 17 2026

Role of Conflict in Society.  Goals and Effects of This. 5 12 2026 

Role of Conflict in Society.  Goals and Effects of This 5 12 2026 

Donald Trump has been president for two terms now.  His war machine now has attacked 3 countries, Afghanistan, Venezuela, and Iran.  He is now calling what was the defense department the “Department of War”.

The war effort in Afghanistan did not work out; at least it brought home no capital.  In Venezuela, Trump had a coup d’etat against Nicholas Maduro.  It remains to be seen if a profit can be made pumping the oil there, assuming companies will be willing to take the risk of going there and working given nationalization could be the result.

Trump’s latest war against Iran, in a cease fire currently, has also not resulted in victory, like Afghanistan.  In the latter the Americans spent a lot of money, and got no real return.

The purpose of war is, one, conquer the country and take anything you want, then, two, put the conquered population to work supporting the conquering country.  

In Afghanistan only number one was achieved.   There was no profit made there,  this tells us the Americans and NATO did not win there.

At this point, Donald Trump’s Department of War looks like a non profit organisation.  One may say adventures like  Afghanistan and Iran are for the public good,  but it remains to be seen if Iran is like  Afghanistan, a large expenditure of capital and men with no profit coming home.

Our casino owner seems to have pious wishes.  But pious wishes do not always bring popularity, and the bourgeois effort to conquer Iran is deeply unpopular, like Afghanistan towards the 20 year mark  of war.

Don’s coup in Venezuela seems to have emboldened him to attack Iran.  The result was Iran fought back, and now the  Americans are getting no military help from NATO, who seems to have learned about Middle Eastern military adventures with the bourgeoisie.

Now that Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices have doubled.  The gains of war in Iraq, control by Chevron and ExxonMobil  of the oil wells there, expropriated from their nationalized state by Americans, are now unable to ship through the Strait.  Every day that goes by is  a loss for ExxonMobil,  it is unable to sell oil and make a profit.

Don feels he is helping society by attacking Iran.  Even if he was, the fact of the matter is capitalists expect to make a profit anytime there is labor involved.  And although war may seem unproductive, a profit can always be made employing the conquered population in capitalist factories.  

But all we have ever seen with Don is a non profit effort, in Afghanistan and Iran. 

It makes one wonder how much longer capitalists will tolerate this.  With control of both Houses of Congress and the presidency, the Republican bourgeoisie can only blame themselves for their  inability to bring home the capital from Iran.  And they can blame Joe Biden for ending the war after 20 long years in a defeat,  but it was Trump who made the peace agreements with the Taliban; Biden just honored them. 

The mid term elections are coming, and the Republican bourgeoisie may lose its majority in the House of Representatives due to these factors.  The Senate rarely falls, it is dominated by large landowners. They are reliably more reactionary than the big bourgeoisie, who sometimes support the radical democrats.  The possibility of losing has sparked a desperate effort to draw new lines in voting districts to keep a Republican  majority.  It’s been most effective in the South, dominated by large landowners.  Fear of nationalization of the land drives forward the most reactionary measures to control suffrage, for instance requiring people to show up to vote on the  day of the election rather than just being mailed a ballot.

The Trumpers will only have themselves to blame  if they lose the war in Iran.  If it stops tomorrow, it remains a non profit effort by Don.  Who will buy the weapons used, if they cannot achieve victory in a developing world country, with little resources?  

That is how it stands, and time is ticking.  The midterm elections could change the course considerably, but nothing will change if perfection is the only way a person votes. The radical democrats are the liberal progressive bourgeoisie, but in the past they have sided with the proletariat, for instance in Europe in 1940.  The sentiment  is not so strong today, but nevertheless they appear less extreme than the reactionary bourgeoisie.  It remains to be seen if this can translate into victory for them.  It is only by being flexible one will achieve change, unbending objects break when pressure is applied. Obstructionist tactics will not be effective, workers representatives are needed who can try to legislate change.  This is not the end all result of worker organization, but begins to address the political movement.  At this point obstructionism will only isolate the workers movement further.  With elections coming Don’s machine could be dealt a decisive blow.

Nicholas Jay Boyes

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic

5 12 2026  

Another Middle Eastern War.

In respect to the conflict between Donald Trump. Benjamin Netanyahu, and Iran, it remains to be seen what will come of it.  At this point it looks like a successful coup de tet, killing Ayatollah Khamenei, and many of his following who were in power.

But no territory was gained by Israel or America, indicating the lack of a clear victory. 

And there is yet to be talk about American capital flowing into Iran, to employ the conquered people, with the goal of making a profit for America.

So it is not a victory yet.  There is currently a cease fire agreement, but the American power is blockading Iran’s ports in the Strait of Hormuz, in retaliation for Iran stopping traffic there.

The strait carries massive quantities of oil to foreign markets, including all of Kuwait and Iraqi oil.  At best Trump bombed some industry there that was pumping oil in Iran, I  guess this looks  like victory?

Israel has yet to remove Hamas from Gaza, even with F35 aircraft the Americans gave them.  Hamas, with no air force, like Afghanistan, again shows the limitations of airplanes bombing cities.  It has been more than 2 years now, Israel has yet to declare victory.  

Yet Trump thought this same group was capable of easily conquering Iran, that  have  industry, and a population twice that of Iraq.

Clearly Trump picks winners.  The way we will know if he won if the oil becomes property of ExxonMobil, like it did in Iraq.  In which case, it brings home profit for the bourgeoisie, which says the adventure had a purpose rather than simple punishment with destruction of a developing world power.

It will be very difficult to secure the Strait of Hormuz if Iran decides to block it again,  as it recently did. You would almost have to remove Iran from the coast, where they could attack boats they didn’t want in the strait.  

And if the goal is simple destruction, it is too easy with a missile or grenade launcher to effectively stop the shipping companies from wasting their capital to traverse a dangerous strait when they can do business elsewhere without insurance needed for a trip through the passage,

OIl prices have almost doubled, and American industry is still building fossil fuel vehicles.  The non metric trucks from Detroit cost a small fortune to commute in.  They are feeling the pressure, as China continues to build electric cars, and the solar panels and wind power to recharge them.  By 2030 about a third of China’s energy will be produced by renewable energy.

I guess if they win they get the Standard Oil monopoly’s fields back. But that cannot stop climate change, driving the economy to renewable energy.  All the oil in the world cannot stop the fact that burning fossil fuels is damaging the ecology, causing the temperature to rise.  It causes freak storms, high temperatures for short periods up north.  It is a monster the likes of which no human has ever seen or had to live with. 

And there is no question that if Iran’s oil returns to the bourgeoisie they will  pump as much as possible, with little or no concern for ecology.  At best they  will create some surplus value for ExxonMobil, and it will  come home to America.

If it stops now it is hard to call it a victory.  They know that, and that is why more men are going there in the Army to fight.  Nothing has been gained financially from bombing Iran, if anything closure of the Strait of Hormuz has cost capitalists money; the shipping companies cannot sail the ships, oil has doubled in value, and rebuilding Iran will cost hundreds of billions of dollars.

Trump looks like he has committed the young men to another endless war in the Middle East.  They just never stop.  Real estate there keeps motivating the bourgeoisie to attempt to conquer.  This is no different than Iraq or Afghanistan, and the latter should show us the limitations of this style or warfare they think will easily win with.

Nicholas Jay Boyes   

Milwaukee Wisconsin

American Democratic Republic 

4 16 2026